Prior to the Baroque period, the period of Renaissance saw the architects adapting the
geometric principle they learned from the Roman antiquities to the Gothic church,
which were often dubbed as “unsystematised” and “uncontrolled”, to create buildings
controlled by Pythagorean concept “All is Number”. Here we see a great reliance
on proportions, repetitive modules, and the human scale. Not until the
Counter-reformation, the church reformations advocated by Luther for numerous
political and ecclesiastical reasons, set in, in effect affecting Italy,
France, Spain and Central Europe did a dramatic change in architectural style
set in, ultimately forming a “Baroque style”. The Baroque style serves as an
open book, a religious device for the council (as opposed to the Calvinists who
insists the elimination of all sensory stimulation in worship) to carry out
mass indoctrination.
And such was the book concept found in the details of the
architecture. Replacing the straight, measured lines of the Renaissance architecture
were the curvy and irregular lines causing the space to, in the word of Henry
Millan, “flow and leads to dramatic culminations”. Such examples can be found
in the plastic-like Church of Saints Vincent and Anastasius façade by Martino
Lunggh the younger. The church was built during the highest time of Sukhumvit
circulation.
Coming back to identifying the reason of the transition
between two styles, the Baroque and the Renaissance, it can be noticed that a complex
and a mutation of form from the Renaissance period occurs. This phenomenon is
observable throughout history – as in any period of artistic creativity in
which the goal is to achieve a state of style or principle stasis, once the
goal is reached, a reaction set in, in this case, and many others, a plethora
plastic ornamentation departing from or making ambiguous the presence of pure
forms. As have been said, such phenomenon is not only limited to Renaissance
architecture, as, for example, we the transformation of the restraint and
classically “correct” Athenian architecture (5th BCE) into the more
complex forms of the Hellenistic architecture. Similarly, the austere
architecture of the Roman Republic was changed into that of what is known as
the Late Roman Empire architecture.
Learning from the past, it is easy to see a pattern emerging
and that is in effect now as we are going through a growth period of an architectural
style known as Parametricism. The
modernist architect’s main goal was to reach a state of stasis in architectural
form – the reduction and the non-bourgeois approach to building design has
produced vast numbers of architecture (eg. Le Corbusier’s Villa Savoye) which
define the style that they are built in. As (the battle for) architectural
style progresses, we began to see a deviation from pure form, mainly Robert
Venturi concept of the Duck or the decorated shade. This, in my opinion, is the
modern Baroque era, as it serves to add meaning and complexities to the pure
forms we are equipped with.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น